Tongue in cheek, which should have been said in my haste before Shabbos. Point is, Pollard is being treated differently because he exposed the US doing wrong. My saying he was upholding America's honor was a way to walk around the point. Bottom line from the beginning of this fork is that America's sworn word as part of a treaty is not worth the paper it is written on as America will decide what parts it will follow when it wants to.
> Say what?? The man was giving secrets away to a foreign country. That's > spying no matter how nicely you dress up the words. It had nothing to do > with US honour etc. In other words its a Palin, you can put lipstick on a > pig, but it still squeals like a pig. > > >America violated its treaty with an ally. An agent of the ally retrieved > the > >information that America SHOULD have given the ally. The allies agent > should > >be killed because he's American and upholding an American treaty? > > He was engaged in spying for a foreign intelligence agency, last I looked > that is considered treachery and ought to punished accordingly. So what do you consider America's violation of their treaty? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:289481 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
