Pollard gave military secrets to a foreign government. Whether and for what reason he did so is immaterial. He could have done it for the noblest of intentions, or a lot of money like Aldrich Aimes, or a Robert Hanssen, its still spying for a foreign government.
Why should someone spying for Israel be treated any differently than Virginia Jean Baynes. She was caught slipping military secrets to the government of the Philippines. There have been others arrested for spying for Ecuador and sending along information about Peru for instance. Others have been caught spying for South Korea, Indonesia, and Columbia. Why should Pollard be treated any differently than these people? They claim the same thing as he did? >Tongue in cheek, which should have been said in my haste before Shabbos. >Point is, Pollard is being treated differently because he exposed the US >doing wrong. My saying he was upholding America's honor was a way to walk >around the point. Bottom line from the beginning of this fork is that >America's sworn word as part of a treaty is not worth the paper it is >written on as America will decide what parts it will follow when it wants >to. > > > >So what do you consider America's violation of their treaty? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:289494 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
