A war on your own soil? Did troops land? Were there naval strikes? A war on your own soil? Isn't that a bit melodramatic?
Terrorist attacks have been happening for decades around the world, just never in America. America was the victim of a horrific terrorist attack, perhaps one that had the largest impact in the history of the world. But to say that there was a 'war' on US Soil...that's a bit of hyperbole in my view. War is war, Terrorist attacks are terrorist attacks. You consistently strive to make a comparison about the gravity of the situation Bush faced as being so much worse than the one facing Obama. I beg to differ. 2009/3/23 Robert Munn <[email protected]> > > No comparison? I agree. Bush was sitting in the White House during the > first > mass attack on U.S. soil by a foreign enemy since Pearl Harbor. We had no > idea if another attack was imminent, no idea if the enemy would attempt > even > larger attacks using chemical, biological, or radiological weapons. > > In short, Bush was in a far more difficult position after 9/11 than Obama > is > in now. Obama finds himself in the middle of an economic mess. Bush found > himself in a war on our own soil. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:292556 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
