it probably is. The point remains, however.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Jerry Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Really good reason to avoid taking TARP funds.
>
> lol.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > so? Nobody is forcing anybody to take TARP funds. You don't want
> government
> > control, don't take taxpayer money. Seems simple enough to me.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Robert Munn <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > We have officially arrived at Soviet central planning. Geithner wants
> the
> > > power to take over companies and install his own board members, which
> > could
> > > end up being members of the cabinet if the rumor I heard is true. Now a
> > > bill
> > > moving through Congress would enable Treasury to set salaries for ALL
> > > employees of any company that received TARP funds:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Beyond-AIG-A-Bill-to-let-Big-Government-Set-Your-Salary-42158597.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:293360
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to