Tracking specific groups is one thing. Suggesting to law enforcement that an entire class of people - white military veterans (and I'm not buying for a second that non-white military vets might be attracted to right-wing extremist groups) - poses a national security risk is anathema to a free society. Imagine if the Bush Admin had released a report saying that Muslim college students in the US posed a national security risk. There would have been a very justifiable uproar over such a report. But Obama's team comes out with a report that practically iindicts our own veterans and it's ok? I don't think so.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Gruss G wrote: > > > Judah wrote: > > I still don't get it. There is a report on Left Wing extremism and > > Right Wing extremism. Both seem to have fairly similar definitions and > > focus on violence. What's the problem? We *should* be profiling and > > monitoring people that seek to perform violent acts. > > > > Yeah, I'm with Judah. What's the big deal? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:295371 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
