Scott Stroz wrote:
> Here is how I look at it.  He and his handlers had to know that his
> rep would get tarnished by offering a settlement. I believe that the
> settlement was offered to keep some of his behavior from becoming
> public knowledge.  Now, what kind of fucked up shit were they hiding
> that made being thought of as a kid toucher the better option?

That may very well be true.  But that behavior could be completely 
non-sexual.  A lot of people would deride an adult individual for 
running around and playing like a 6 year old.  I'm just one to hold of 
vilifying someone just one someone else's second hand opinions.  Until 
direct testimony or physical evidence shows up, I'll just hold scammers 
and sciko jacko to be equal probabilities.

Now, after his passing, such testimony and\or physical evidence has a 
much higher chance of showing up, so I'm in a wait and see mode.





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:299079
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to