I never said I would do nothing, I am just asking what you would do.
Which apparently is to analyze, analyze and then more analysis. You
are a broken record. 'Bush did not analyze, I would analyze. Bush did
not analyze, I would analyze...'. Contrary to what consultants think,
analyzing data alone will not solve any problems, you actually have to
do something with the knowledge gained from that analysis.

Once more, after your rounds of analysis were completed and you
uncovered the 9/11 plot.  What next? What would you do to stop the
attacks? Because just analyzing the data alone would not have stopped
those planes on 9/11.

Or maybe you think just knowing we were analyzing the data might have
been enough to scare the terrorists away.

Terrorist: "Osama, what do we do now?  The Americans are analyzing?'

Osama: "We musty cancel the attack plans. We need to find a country to
target that does not analyze as much...maybe France?"


On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Gruss Gott<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Scott wrote:
>> So, basically you are saying that you know enough, even after not
>> being on Bush's, team to state he was wrong with what he did, but not
>> enough to know what the right course of action would be? Sounds to me
>> like a classic case of cranial rectitis.
>>
>
> Well we all have our unique talents.  But yes, knowing what is common
> public knowledge, he clearly feck it up.  Just summarize yet again for
> you in the hopes you have an epiphany:
>
> 1.) We got hit.
>
> 2.) The 9/11 commission looked into who knew what then, and what they
> did.  They didn't do the options analysis, but they looked into what
> was known and by whom.
>
> 3.) The 9/11 commission reported that while Bush knew UBL was a threat
> to US homeland, while Bush has specifically asked that question
> numerous times, Bush did NOT discuss it with his national security
> adviser and no special team was assembled nor did his national
> security adviser do anything.  Further Tenet stopped briefing the
> President about the threat.
>
> What can I (not you I guess) conclude from this?
>
> Well for me it seems obvious but I guess it's not: Bush knew of clear
> threat but did nothing.
>
> So what would I have done?  More than nothing.  I'd have done the
> options analysis.
>
> See the difference?  You and Bush: do nothing;  Me?  More than nothing.
>
> Anything spark in there for ya?
>
> Well I gave it a final go anyway.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:299946
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to