> Scott wrote: > So, basically you are saying that you know enough, even after not > being on Bush's, team to state he was wrong with what he did, but not > enough to know what the right course of action would be? Sounds to me > like a classic case of cranial rectitis. >
Well we all have our unique talents. But yes, knowing what is common public knowledge, he clearly feck it up. Just summarize yet again for you in the hopes you have an epiphany: 1.) We got hit. 2.) The 9/11 commission looked into who knew what then, and what they did. They didn't do the options analysis, but they looked into what was known and by whom. 3.) The 9/11 commission reported that while Bush knew UBL was a threat to US homeland, while Bush has specifically asked that question numerous times, Bush did NOT discuss it with his national security adviser and no special team was assembled nor did his national security adviser do anything. Further Tenet stopped briefing the President about the threat. What can I (not you I guess) conclude from this? Well for me it seems obvious but I guess it's not: Bush knew of clear threat but did nothing. So what would I have done? More than nothing. I'd have done the options analysis. See the difference? You and Bush: do nothing; Me? More than nothing. Anything spark in there for ya? Well I gave it a final go anyway. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:299941 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
