> Cam wrote: > Rolling Stone is one of the most ridiculously biased publications out > there. Their credibility is zero on political/economic stories. >
Don't read Matt Tiabbi, huh? I challenge you to fault his facts mostly because you can't. Oh, and as an FYI, Goldman Sachs tried to and he tore them apart. They looked like fools. And now GS has shut their mouth. But please try - please head on over to Matt's site and take on his facts directly. If you succeed, then you can challenge Rolling Stone's credibility. Until then, you're talking so far out of your depth I'm embarrassed for you. How's that for opinion? : ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:300089 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
