Actually no. Jerusalem is Jerusalem and even though someone wants it to be another country, it is not (yet). The artificial idea of east Jerusalem is one that is only a few dozen years old and came out of the time when Jordan invaded and took over Jerusalem.
As for ownership, the only problem is lawsuits, not actual legal ownership. The land was owned by Jews, taken over by Jordan, and eventually bought by another Jew. The question is ownership by a Jew. There are laws in the PA that make selling land to Jews illegal and subject to death. This is the basis of the suits going on. Hm. I wonder if Obama will mention those PA laws when he talks about peace and "racial" policy. <troll> But Obama is a rainy day race champion. Rich professor? defend. Poor blacks in Darfur? ignore. Arab dictatorships, theocracies, and monarchies? pander to. Jewish democratic allies? ignore. On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Dana<[email protected]> wrote: > > Isn't the problem that the land he bought is considered by some to be in a > completely different county and to belong to someone other than the party > that sold it to him? > > >> When a Jew is told that the property he bought can't be used because >> it's in an Arab neighborhood but an Arab can buy property in a Jewish >> neighborhood without a problem then we have a racist policy. A No Jews >> Allowed policy. >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:301037 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
