>Ah, I see. I agree to a certain extent. Loss of choice is a real issue if we
>go to a single-payer system, but loss of choice is not the issue that is
>going to bankrupt us - demographics are.

What choice do you have now. You either use the insurance provider's network or 
you pay through the nose. Some choice. It would seem to me that a single payer 
system offers more choice, since all but a very small minority of doctors are a 
part of it. You can go see any physician who is willing to accept you as a 
patient. To give an example, 3 years ago my mother was very dissatisfied with 
the care she received from her current doctor in Vancouver. All she had to do 
is to make an appointment with the another physician and that was it, the 
records were forwarded to the new provider and BC Medical took care of the 
rest. In contrast when I switched insurance plans recently I was very limited 
to a select group of medical providers, not including my then current 
endocrinologist. Under the so-called competitive model my choices were severely 
limited. 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:301359
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to