ok but suppose you are debating somone online. Kinda like this, except that
one of us is in a library, And say the other person is you and you call me a
terrorist. We're still debating though, because I have learned to expect
that from you. As I read it, that conversation is at that point reportable.
In fact MUST be reported if the lirary knows about it. What does that so to
our debate?

The law itself is not debate, silly. And which do you think i am more afraid
of, Guantanamo or Obama having my email address? I hate to tell you this
Robert, but he already does because of the online elections donations.

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Robert Munn <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > why not? Because librarians aren't people or because libraries don't
> > contain
> > information important to policy, or because it's not infoming if it was
> > Bush
> > asking?
>
>
> Because it was a well-intentioned, horribly ill-conceived request to help
> prevent further terrorist attacks after 9/11, not a mere policy debate.
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:301638
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to