You know, I heard a story a long time ago on an Interbase list that was
confirmed by someone who claimed he was there. The story is out there on the
web somewhere too.
This big retail golf company had spent some absurd amount of money in the
10's of million's of dollars on a customized Oracle based CSR data entry
system. Well after a year in development the big rollout day came, and it
crashed. The system could barely handle 40 concurrent users without
crashing! They had to shut down the call center until they could get the old
system back up. It was designed for hundreds iirc.
Anyway, the company lost millions of dollars, and Oracle themselves brought
in 12 of their own developers to fix the system....around 6 months later it
was finally finished.

The only thing all that expensive software scales is their bottom line...

jon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Duane Boudreau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:29 PM
Subject: RE: ATG Dynamo - Anyone????


> the new suits in the tech dept :( completely changing everything from
> CF/Win2K/SQL7 to solaris/java/oracle. unfortunately they are choosing to
> ignore CFMX, based on nothing more than sheer bias. ColdFusion isn't
> scalable you know (insert gagging noise)
>
> The price scheme is:
>
> 125k per processor for production boxes
> 60k per processor for staging boxes
> 5k per dev license
> + 18% for support (not an optional)
>
> add Oracle and the cost is well over 500k w/o hardware
>
> everything has to be sun, cisco & oracle.
>
> thanks on the web site - CFExperts has been under construction for about 3
> years now :) one of these days..... ha ha ha
>
>
> Duane


______________________________________________________________________
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to