On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Dana<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> wowie I could spend an afternoon with google trying to figure out what same
> is reading, or (probably) I could go straight to world news daily...but you
> are right, I won't read it. Experience says nothing fruitful is there.

You're confused.

> But just for fun:
>
> Who says Soros is bussing in anyone? And why?
> Anti-war crews?
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Sunday_Reflections/Remember-when-protest-was-patriotic-52767517.html

On March 16, USA Today reported that Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum
"was among dozens of members of Congress who ran gantlets of
demonstrators and shouted over hecklers at Social Security events last
month. Many who showed up to protest were alerted by e-mails and bused
in by anti-Bush organizations such as MoveOn.org and USAction, a
liberal advocacy group. They came with prepared questions and
instructions on how to confront lawmakers."


> To a health care debate? Come to think of it he may  be onto
> something there....

If I type slower will you be able to keep up? :P

> Unions are bussing in thugs? What does a union thug look like when it's at
> home?

I have a friend that's a union thug and he's 6'5" and 250 lbs. He was
scary even in high school.

>The only union member I know is a systems analyst with a physical
> disability ;)

You're now on a GG tangent.

>> What improved outcomes? They all send their sick here :)
> uh... no they don't ;)

You're right, only the ones that can afford it.

> They removed the part about your doctor getting paid for answering any
> questions you might have about living wills. Which sounds a lot like
> muzzling family planning workers to me. It's sooo last administration. Shame
> on Obama. You can't conciliate with people who aren't speaking in good
> faith. Course, I keep talking to you, so who am I to throw the first stone?

Not answering question, asking them unprompted. Getting paid to sit
grandma down and tell her it's time isn't right.
If she asks fine.

If this part of the bill was so clean cut why are even the libs
speaking against it?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/07/AR2009080703043.html

>  Possibly I was being cryptic. The idea there is (for example) you have
> cancer and the chemo isn't working. Why keep giving it to you if we know
> that? Palliative care has its place.

Who stays on chemo when they know it's not working? I never imagined
people would want to go through the pain for naught.

> No, all of the news stories I have read are about how angry people show up
> at  town halls. No specifics on what they are angry about. I did see a
> transcript of Obama's but none of the others.

Didn't the little light go on?
Your reading bias news, I'll give you some time to think about it.

>> Funny how the angry Americans show up at town hall meetings
>> asking questions from a bill that they read but the politician hasn't.
>>
>
> If these people had read the bill they would not be yelling about death
> panels.

Apparently you didn't read it.
If it wasn't an issue they wouldn't have removed i

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:302019
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to