Well I don't know how it might relate to the U.S. but recently when getting my 1.5 yr old a passport to travel, the passport office required a long form birth certificate. The long form b.c. had some additional info on it that the short form didn't. If I remember correctly the long form had some additional hospital info and more info about her mom and I. However the info that both the short form and long form shared is indentical. So I guess what I'm saying is if the short form says he's born in Hawaii the long form is going to say the exact same thing. It's not like the short form is completely different from the long form. So people making a big hulabaloo about this are just wankers.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:21 PM, G Money <[email protected]> wrote: > > "The document is a 'certification of birth,' also known as a short-form > birth certificate. The long form is drawn up by the hospital and includes > additional information such as birth weight and parents' hometowns. The > short form is printed by the state and draws from a database with fewer > details. The Hawaii Department of Health's birth record request form does > not give the option to request a photocopy of your long-form birth > certificate, but their short form has enough information to be acceptable > to > the State Department. We tried to ask the Hawaii DOH why they only offer > the > short form, among other questions, but they have not given a response." > > as to 2007: > > "We asked the Obama campaign about the date stamp and the blacked-out > certificate number. The certificate is stamped June 2007, because that's > when Hawaii officials produced it for the campaign, which requested that > document and "all the records we could get our hands on" according to > spokesperson Shauna Daly." > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > A Certification of Live Birth from 2007 is not the same as a birth > > certificate. > > The state of Hawaii did not accept it as proof of being native born > > until after June 10, 2009. > > > > Factcheck.org outright lied when they say they touched and > > photographed the original birth certificate since the date on it is > > 2007. > > > > This whole thing could end in a second. What are they hiding? > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:57 AM, G Money<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Nope. They just said they saw his original. Never confirmed what it > > >> said or even if he was born there. > > >> Nobody even knows which hospital he was born in. > > > > > > > > > You want to know what it says....read it yourself: > > > > > > http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html > > > > > > -- > > > Some things will never change > > > That's just the way it is > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:302701 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
