the canadian long form gives like the name of the doctor and maybe the time/
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Michael Grant <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well I don't know how it might relate to the U.S. but recently when getting > my 1.5 yr old a passport to travel, the passport office required a long > form > birth certificate. The long form b.c. had some additional info on it that > the short form didn't. If I remember correctly the long form had some > additional hospital info and more info about her mom and I. However the > info > that both the short form and long form shared is indentical. So I guess > what > I'm saying is if the short form says he's born in Hawaii the long form is > going to say the exact same thing. It's not like the short form is > completely different from the long form. So people making a big hulabaloo > about this are just wankers. > > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:21 PM, G Money <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > "The document is a 'certification of birth,' also known as a short-form > > birth certificate. The long form is drawn up by the hospital and includes > > additional information such as birth weight and parents' hometowns. The > > short form is printed by the state and draws from a database with fewer > > details. The Hawaii Department of Health's birth record request form does > > not give the option to request a photocopy of your long-form birth > > certificate, but their short form has enough information to be acceptable > > to > > the State Department. We tried to ask the Hawaii DOH why they only offer > > the > > short form, among other questions, but they have not given a response." > > > > as to 2007: > > > > "We asked the Obama campaign about the date stamp and the blacked-out > > certificate number. The certificate is stamped June 2007, because that's > > when Hawaii officials produced it for the campaign, which requested that > > document and "all the records we could get our hands on" according to > > spokesperson Shauna Daly." > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > A Certification of Live Birth from 2007 is not the same as a birth > > > certificate. > > > The state of Hawaii did not accept it as proof of being native born > > > until after June 10, 2009. > > > > > > Factcheck.org outright lied when they say they touched and > > > photographed the original birth certificate since the date on it is > > > 2007. > > > > > > This whole thing could end in a second. What are they hiding? > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:57 AM, G Money<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Nope. They just said they saw his original. Never confirmed what it > > > >> said or even if he was born there. > > > >> Nobody even knows which hospital he was born in. > > > > > > > > > > > > You want to know what it says....read it yourself: > > > > > > > > http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Some things will never change > > > > That's just the way it is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:302778 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
