why would factcheck lie? Seems like they have everything to lose and nothing to gain by doing so...
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > A Certification of Live Birth from 2007 is not the same as a birth > certificate. > The state of Hawaii did not accept it as proof of being native born > until after June 10, 2009. > > Factcheck.org outright lied when they say they touched and > photographed the original birth certificate since the date on it is > 2007. > > This whole thing could end in a second. What are they hiding? > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:57 AM, G Money<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Nope. They just said they saw his original. Never confirmed what it > >> said or even if he was born there. > >> Nobody even knows which hospital he was born in. > > > > > > You want to know what it says....read it yourself: > > > > http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html > > > > -- > > Some things will never change > > That's just the way it is > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:302776 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
