>But the palestinian authority is the one releasing >these numbers - why wouldn't they include the missing? Sorry, but what Palestinian authority ? but then again, didn�t the 500 dead people also come from different individuals of the Palestinian Authority ?, so the 500 is false, but the 56 is true cause you like it better ?, and your source is a reporter who claims a man in the PA authority told him its 56. Ok, if it makes you feel better, 56 it is, but I still hope and pray it stops at 56, I mean, you rather me say your source is lying and and it is 500, I said I hope it is 56 and I hope it stops there, what else you want me to say�.I�m I there to go and dig the bodies out and tell for sure, no, I could have very easly posted a link that said over 500 people�but I agreed and said I hope the number is 56 people who Israel killed, and not 500�was I supposed to say I hope not and I hope more people have been killed ?, or was i supposed to say yes, that is the correct number, like i said, how do i know....how do you know ?
>I would guess that you can't compare the number of >dead people in incidents based on the military leader >responsible. Its like saying "Beth once stepped on >the sidewalk killing 300 ants so EVERY time Beth >Stepped on the sidewalks she kills 300 ants". No ? why not ?, look at previous PM of Israel and see during whos period the most masacres and the most palestinians killed, and you will find that Sharon was there in 67, he even brags about how many he killed in many books, so why are you getting so sensative, he doesn�t care about his image, he brags about this�you want to call him aliar and tell him no you didn�t do and say all these things..c�mone now�..and Sharon was there in 82 , and guess who is there now in 01-02 ? >Why should Israel have to prove what the Palestinans >have verified? I should think that IS proof enough, >no? what did the Palestinians verify ? who is even this man that this reporter claimed he asked and was told it is 56 dead bodies, where is this reporter ? is he there in Jenin ? he is supposedly quoating a man who is in the West Bank, why couldn�t he find anyone in Jenin to ask ? so all this reporter could muster out of this guy is just a number, nothing else, just 56 , and here you have one reporter who solved the whole problem, forget the UN forget digging the bodies, forget everything, this reporter claims he spoke to someone who I never heard of and he told him its 56 the number of people found dead�So what ? whats this supposed to prove or say ? I�m sorry, but if you think this proves anything, than I don�t know what to say, let me go get you a couple of articles that say the death is 500 or 100 or 200, whatever number you want, and you think Israel is saying to the world,wait, a reporter has spoken to a man who said the dead is 56, case closed�our image is cleaned..i don�t think so� __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
