On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:12 AM, G Money<[email protected]> wrote: > > > It's usually hilarious. I think GG is talking mainly about his interviews.
They're just as bad with the missing facts > If Cronkite or Rather were giving an editorial, I might agree with you...but > otherwise they just reported the news. I'd say that's quite different than > Rush. When Cronkite REPORTED the war in Vietnam was lost even though we won the battle he was referring to America turned against the war. When Rather REPORTED the fake documents were real Bush almost lost the election. >> If you're better informed about current events then he either is a >> more informative entertainer or the better informed know he speaks the >> truth. >> > > Anyone who listens to a program that discusses current events, for three > hours a day, every day, is going to be well informed about current events. The PEW polls are based on how many answered the current event question correctly. > The "truth" of the events are indisputable, while the "truth" of Rush's > opinion and conclusion about said event is.....well....let's say debatable. I would hope so. Many on this list thing not. They think everything he says is the opposite if the truth. Now that's scary. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:303524 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
