On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Ian Skinner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Which is exactly what you get if you ask a bunch of statisticians to > analyze a set of number in a blind study without telling them what the > numbers represent.
4 hired by the AP They hired 11 fact checkers for Palin's book. Who said anything about global cooling anyway? Wasn't that NewsWeek in the 70's? Temperatures have not increased for ten years according to your statisticians. Yet all the countries that Joined Kyoto bar Britain have increased CO2 output. As did India and China. So why isn't it getting hotter? > http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091026/ap_on_bi_ge/us_sci_global_cooling > http://www.drudge.com/news/127017/statisticians-reject-global-cooling-blind > http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/ap-impact-statisticians-reject-174088.html > > But, I presume empirical evidence like this does not sway you Sam, > because you can find a minority who will disagree with it somehow. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308158 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
