Energy pumped into the system doesn't necessarily mean that things will get hotter, it will mean that the mean temperature will get increasingly more variable and extreme, with a constant upward trend. Just because a couple of years are lower than expected, doesn't mean there is no upwards trend.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Ian Skinner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Which is exactly what you get if you ask a bunch of statisticians to >> analyze a set of number in a blind study without telling them what the >> numbers represent. > > 4 hired by the AP > They hired 11 fact checkers for Palin's book. > > Who said anything about global cooling anyway? Wasn't that NewsWeek in the > 70's? > Temperatures have not increased for ten years according to your > statisticians. Yet all the countries that Joined Kyoto bar Britain > have increased CO2 output. As did India and China. So why isn't it > getting hotter? > > >> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091026/ap_on_bi_ge/us_sci_global_cooling >> http://www.drudge.com/news/127017/statisticians-reject-global-cooling-blind >> http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/ap-impact-statisticians-reject-174088.html >> >> But, I presume empirical evidence like this does not sway you Sam, >> because you can find a minority who will disagree with it somehow. >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308179 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
