Lol.. I'm a reasonable person, and not anal retentive. I know that people get into fights in marriages and relationships, and that they often work things out between themselves. And I feel that they should have a chance to do so without everyone else interfering. So in my view this has nothing to do with 'domestic violence'.
The issue between TIger Woods and his Wife is a private issue. Nike has a contract with Tiger.That is between him and Nike. if you don't like the way that Nike's board is running the company then do something at the next shareholders meeting. If you think that this incident impacts on some sort of CONTRACTUAL agreement between Tiger and Nike and the company is covering it up,then take court action to find out what happened between Tiger Woods and his wife. ;-) 2009/12/1 Won Lee <[email protected]>: > > I'm not the one taking this to unreasonable lengths. The SEC rules are > clear on this. Nike owes its stock holders an explanation. I'm following > the rules. > > You first wrote Nike doesn't owe us an explanation. I gave you an SEC link > that reads otherwise. Now you are saying the information is immaterial > without saying why. > > I think we can all see where this thread is heading: no where. I have > presented my opinion backed up by what I think is pretty logical arguments > and a link to the SEC. > > Some of you believe that this incident is a private matter. I don't agree > with that opinion but I respect all of you enough to accept ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308792 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
