Yes, we should take steps to mitigate. Technology, not regulation, is the solution.Instead of sending billions overseas for carbon credits, we ought to be investing heavily in clean coal, nuclear, and alternative fuel vehicles. Oh yeah, we're doing that now. We should put more federal dollars on research and let the market do what it does best - innovate.
On 12/15/09, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Foregoing the debate about whether the current bout of global climate > change is anthropogenic or not, I'm curious what your take is, Robert, > on whether we should still try and mitigate it with our own actions. > > So, lets posit for a moment that the dominant driver of climate change > is not human activity. If so, do you think we humans have the > capability of influencing climate change with the increase or decrease > of carbon dioxide and methane emissions? If we do have that > capability, do you think it is wise for us to decrease carbon > emissions in order to try and keep the climate closer to its current > state in which we humans are happily adapted? > > Judah > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Robert Munn <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/146138 >> >> have a good read, b!tches! > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:309397 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
