Either way, they would be forced to air content that their viewers and/or advertisers would normal watch/sponsor. Essentially taking money out of the pockets of the broadcasters.
I do like your last idea - too often in the media today opinion is touted as fact. On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > It doesn't force broadcasts to air shows, only to offer time to > opposing opinions. Do you not remember the little snippets that were > occasionally aired at the end of newscasts when the station would run > an opinion piece and had to allow the opposing view to have a say? > > Frankly I would be content with a law forcing broadcasters to label > opinion as opinion, instead of allowing it to be presented as news or > fact. > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> But could that not force broadcasters to air shows that may not be >> profitable, or, possibly, not air shows that are? >> >> Seems a bit unfair. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:310982 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
