No it would mean that if Limbaugh or Hannity bloviates, there is an equal opportunity for someone to rebut him. For beck it would mean having a full time job avoiding hate speech charges.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > But could that not force broadcasters to air shows that may not be > profitable, or, possibly, not air shows that are? > > Seems a bit unfair. > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The fairness doctrine was in place for years and no was forced to >> listen to anyone. That's the whole point of the fairness doctrine - >> it allows the presentation of both sides of the story and gives the >> listener options. Which is exactly right-wing talk show hosts are >> against it. It takes away their bully platform. >> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> The fairness doctrine will make people listen to those lunatic losers, >>> or force the rational ones off the air. Either way it's a win for the >>> left. >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311010 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
