> Its a java app. just like CF or Open Office. If the nature of Java apps on the desktop is that they need to have the JVM settings tweaked before they run properly, then I would assert that Adobe made a poor decision to create CFBuilder on top of Eclipse. I have no problem tweaking the settings on CF Server, and I appreciate that I can. What I'm saying is that for the IDE, we shouldn't NEED to do that to get a half-way decent experience out of it. I don't have to go into the Windows registry and change things around in order for Visual Studio to run well, and that one a beast of a program. Why should anyone be expected to do so for CFBuilder?
I truly hope that Adobe can pull one out of the hat and address the problems and deliver a great product. In my opinion, though, they've approached it from the wrong directly. -Justin ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311003 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
