Dana I'm neither Sam nor Fox news, and you know this
maaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnn........................

The only things I thought were wrong were them giving the tax advice.  I
never believed that they took part in human trafficking.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dana [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:39 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: o'keefe's latest expose


ACORN endorses  human trafficking? And any number of other wild claims for
the period. Let me refer you to the archives.

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:36 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Editing is not invention.
>
> What did this guy make up?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dana [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 3:51 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: o'keefe's latest expose
>
>
>  ok, and now that you realize that the tape was edited, can you put your
> finger on what was disgusting exactly? A prostitute is required to pay
> taxes. We have mention of a house. We have mention of  young girls.
NOWHERE
> in the tapes I watched do we have mention of those girls being sex slaves.
> Prostitution is mentioned, a house is mentioned elsewhere, girls are
> mentioned later. It is all assumed to make sense because of the
> film-makers'
> prejudices.
>
> The idea that a couple dressed up like something out of the Rockford files
> was taken seriously and actually assisted is something... well I am sorry
> but it beggars belief. I saw one tax preparer say "don't tell me that",
> which might be illegal, true. And she was fired.
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:11 PM, G Money <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > ACORN? I still think it is astonishing how few people actually watched
> > that
> > > video.
> >
> >
> > Uh....I actually watched the video, and I saw a couple of really slimy
> > assholes who happened to work for ACORN.
> >
> > I refuse to indict the entire organization simply because they had some
> > assholes on their payroll, but lets not pretend that what was shown in
> that
> > one video was anything less than disgusting.
> >
> >
> > > Ask yourself this. If he wanted to demonstrate that Landrieu does not
> > > answer the phone, supposing she does not, why not just call the phone?
> > >
> >
> > I think his excuse is full of shit. That O'Keefe guy is the worst kind
of
> > egotistical slime. Just looking at his smug face makes me want to kick a
> > puppy.
> >
> > --
> > It's such a clever innocence
> > In which you do your sorcery
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311355
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to