So you think tax preparers should turn away people they disapprove of? Bill Gates, for example? Just asking. I do think the one that said "don't tell me that" was wrong. Otherwise, if you are in the business of helping people stay legal with the IRS, then that is what you should do.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:49 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dana I'm neither Sam nor Fox news, and you know this > maaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnn........................ > > The only things I thought were wrong were them giving the tax advice. I > never believed that they took part in human trafficking. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dana [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:39 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: o'keefe's latest expose > > > ACORN endorses human trafficking? And any number of other wild claims for > the period. Let me refer you to the archives. > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:36 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Editing is not invention. > > > > What did this guy make up? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dana [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 3:51 PM > > To: cf-community > > Subject: Re: o'keefe's latest expose > > > > > > ok, and now that you realize that the tape was edited, can you put your > > finger on what was disgusting exactly? A prostitute is required to pay > > taxes. We have mention of a house. We have mention of young girls. > NOWHERE > > in the tapes I watched do we have mention of those girls being sex > slaves. > > Prostitution is mentioned, a house is mentioned elsewhere, girls are > > mentioned later. It is all assumed to make sense because of the > > film-makers' > > prejudices. > > > > The idea that a couple dressed up like something out of the Rockford > files > > was taken seriously and actually assisted is something... well I am sorry > > but it beggars belief. I saw one tax preparer say "don't tell me that", > > which might be illegal, true. And she was fired. > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:11 PM, G Money <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > ACORN? I still think it is astonishing how few people actually > watched > > > that > > > > video. > > > > > > > > > Uh....I actually watched the video, and I saw a couple of really slimy > > > assholes who happened to work for ACORN. > > > > > > I refuse to indict the entire organization simply because they had some > > > assholes on their payroll, but lets not pretend that what was shown in > > that > > > one video was anything less than disgusting. > > > > > > > > > > Ask yourself this. If he wanted to demonstrate that Landrieu does not > > > > answer the phone, supposing she does not, why not just call the > phone? > > > > > > > > > > I think his excuse is full of shit. That O'Keefe guy is the worst kind > of > > > egotistical slime. Just looking at his smug face makes me want to kick > a > > > puppy. > > > > > > -- > > > It's such a clever innocence > > > In which you do your sorcery > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311360 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
