"In order to refute Global Warming, one needs to show how the entire body of
evidence is incorrect"

It is hard to describe how much I disagree with this statement.

First of all, is it even talking about man-made global warming?  There are
surely periods of global warming.  Each ice-age was followed by an extended
period of global warming.  So, even if there is global warming currently
happening, and that is a big IF, is it just a natural cycle?

Next, the part about showing the entire body of evidence to be incorrect is
ludicrous.  It puts an impossible burden on skeptics.   I call bull-shit.
If someone can prove that a foundational piece of data is corrupt,
manufactured, or used incorrectly, then the whole hypothesis is on shaky
ground.

"What kills me is that one (1) set of bad data from an obscure school that
no one had heard of is being used as the basis to shoot down an entire
hypothesis."

While most people may not know about East Anglia, that doesn't mean its data
manipulation (more than one set) isn't enough to seriously damage the
man-made global warming hypothesis.  East Anglia has one of the world’s
leading climate change research centers.  It also plays a leading role in
compiling UN reports and tracks long-term temperature changes.

>From it's own website:

The Climatic Research Unit is widely recognised as one of the world's
leading institutions concerned with the study of natural and anthropogenic
climate change.

Consisting of a staff of around thirty research scientists and students, the
Unit has developed a number of the data sets widely used in climate
research, including the global temperature record used to monitor the state
of the climate system, as well as statistical software packages and climate
models.

Alongside its research activities, the Unit has an educational role through
its contribution to formal teaching with the School of Environmental
Sciences (most notably, the MSc in Climate Change) and various forms of
in-service training including postgraduate education. It is regarded as an
authoritative source of information on both the science and policy aspects
of climate change by the media and maintains a high public profile.

The staff of the Unit have an enviable publication record, contributing to
both peer-review and popular journals as well as editing various newsletters
and bulletins.

The Climatic Research Unit is part of the School of Environmental Sciences
with close links to other research groups within the department such as the
Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment. The Unit
undertakes collaborative research with institutes throughout the world on a
diverse range of topics and is coordinating or contributing to a number of
networking activities.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:312098
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to