"it makes perfect sense to me." No surprise there.
"They cannot attack the accumulated evidence," Making the assumption that there is accumulated evidence, which is a big assumption. If you have a link to any evidence that is not somehow associated with East Anglia, the UN, or NASA, post a link. " so rather than provide a better explanation for the entire body of data they hope to succeed by using sleazy political tactics." A better explanation was provided. The data is fraudulent. No need for sleazy political tactics. "Sounds typical for the special interests supporting the climate change deniers." It seems that most of the special interest groups in the climate change arena are on the side of global warming. The "Green" technology companies, tree huggers, ex-hippy, anti-capitalists, etc. These are the ones who resorted to sleazy politics. For example: researchers who were not part of the cult have been black-listed. Their papers have been refused publications. Time for Al Gore to return the Nobel. The party is over. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:312109 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
