The prime examples I see tend to mimic the current talking points of their party of choice, and don't exhibit any degree of either independent or critical thought. I have yet to see anything resembling original thinking on many political topics, rather more often than not its either a simple parroting of the talking points, or a simple reshuffling of them. Ergo what am i to conclude.
One original cognizant well reasoned and thought out argument is all that's required. For those I have yet to see such. On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> ]. I'd rather have a very >> skeptical and informed individual than a propagandized drone of any of >> the political bents. > > The problem is, if that informed individual disagrees with you you > call them a drone. > > -- > Scott Stroz > --------------- > The DOM is retarded. > > http://xkcd.com/386/ > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:312323 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
