One could argue that your constant berating of Bush was nothing more than you echoing the strong anti-Bush sentiment that was (and in some cases, still is) prevalent in this country.
Wait..I get it. If they agree with your point of view then they have independent or critical thought, but if they don't, they are drones. Noted. On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > The prime examples I see tend to mimic the current talking points of > their party of choice, and don't exhibit any degree of either > independent or critical thought. I have yet to see anything resembling > original thinking on many political topics, rather more often than not > its either a simple parroting of the talking points, or a simple > reshuffling of them. Ergo what am i to conclude. > > One original cognizant well reasoned and thought out argument is all > that's required. For those I have yet to see such. > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> ]. I'd rather have a very >>> skeptical and informed individual than a propagandized drone of any of >>> the political bents. >> >> The problem is, if that informed individual disagrees with you you >> call them a drone. >> >> -- >> Scott Stroz >> --------------- >> The DOM is retarded. >> >> http://xkcd.com/386/ >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:312324 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
