A pro in one religion is a con in another. A pro in Christianity and Islam is to preach the word and seek converts. A con in Judaism is to convert or to seek converts. Jains don't eat meat of any sort. Jews and Muslims don't eat pig. And on and on and on...
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Casey Dougall <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Michael Dinowitz < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> So here's the question. Who's religion should be integrated into our >> foreign policy? We have an envoy to the Organization of The Islamic >> Conference, should we have one to some Christian, Jewish, Hindu, etc. >> agency? (the Islamic envoy post was set up by Bush, not Obama. The >> current ones quotes supporting terrorism is another story) >> >> >> > Take Pros on each religion > > Remove Cons from each religion > > Condense the differances between the pros of each religion into specific > area / sub points > > Call it "Religion in Government" > > Only refer to "Religion in Government" never the "Who's religion" in all > policy > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:312539 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
