from my pov, I'm still trying to find a pro in any religion :)
On Feb 24, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Michael Dinowitz wrote: > > A pro in one religion is a con in another. A pro in Christianity and > Islam is to preach the word and seek converts. A con in Judaism is to > convert or to seek converts. Jains don't eat meat of any sort. Jews > and Muslims don't eat pig. And on and on and on... > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Casey Dougall > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Michael Dinowitz < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> So here's the question. Who's religion should be integrated into our >>> foreign policy? We have an envoy to the Organization of The Islamic >>> Conference, should we have one to some Christian, Jewish, Hindu, etc. >>> agency? (the Islamic envoy post was set up by Bush, not Obama. The >>> current ones quotes supporting terrorism is another story) >>> >>> >>> >> Take Pros on each religion >> >> Remove Cons from each religion >> >> Condense the differances between the pros of each religion into specific >> area / sub points >> >> Call it "Religion in Government" >> >> Only refer to "Religion in Government" never the "Who's religion" in all >> policy >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:312542 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
