Your first post was to me: > what are you talking about? It is so far past irrelevant that its even > more meaningless than your typical drivel.
Your third post, also to me: > if you want to argue by nonsense then no, I have no wish to argue with > a bloviating fool. If you want to discuss ideas and facts in a > rational respectful manner then sure. But you had better have the data > to back up your statements.. My fifth post referred to your third post as idiotic. That was my first insult to you. Care to apologize? On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > Pot, kettle, black. Pardon me, but in the only discussion I've had > with you rcently, you decided to start slinging Moron and imbecile in > your first note, while I for one tried to keep the discussion without > the insults. In other words quit the hypocrisy. > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Now who are you talking about? >> >> Keep in mind that when Larry and Dana are in full insult mode, jumping >> in on their side with snark might get misunderstood, that's why we >> have to use those stupid emoticons :) >> >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> They just take everything so seriously. Ninety percent of what I post >>> lately is either snark or parody, and they just don't get it. >>> >>> Maybe they need a humor infusion. >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:313001 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
