On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The CBO numbers aren't cooked. They are based on the bill as written.
> However, I agree with critics who say that some things that are in
> there, like decreases in Medicare payments in future years, as
> unlikely to go through in reality as it is written in the bill.  On
> the other hand, fully 50% of the deficit reduction is accounted for by
> payroll taxes on income above 200K a year. I suspect that those will
> stay in place and so I would conclude that we won't likely see the 1.3
> trillion deficit reduction the CBO scored but I do believe that we
> will see a deficit reduction of some scale.

The CBO was asked to score it on ten years while we collect taxes for
four years before the plan even starts. That's what I mean by cooking
the numbers.
A real analysis would be 10 years from when it started. They also
count the medicare cuts and we all know there won't be any cuts.

>> Many reasons, I never had insurance until I was nearly 40. Always took
>> excellent care of myself. Many people uninsured have enough money to
>> cover any medical expense so don't need it. The main group to worry
>> about is the unemployed. Their numbers will increase because of this
>> bill and this bill does nothing for them except forcing them to pay a
>> fine they can't afford to pay. People will lose their homes.
>
> I do not believe in any way, shape or form that unemployment will
> increase as a result of the passage of this bill. American business
> has been shown to be at a competitive disadvantage owing to health
> care costs. A decrease in health insurance rate climbs coupled with a
> workforce that will receive more routine preventative care will
> increase the productivity and profitability of the US.

Small business will need to provide insurance or be fined. Even for
part timers.

> Medical bankruptcies are a huge problem in America. People are not
> going to lose their homes because we are helping prevent those.

You missed my point. I you are unemployed for an extended time,
collecting $400 a week, you will not be able to afford health care so
you will have to pay a fine and not have coverage. That fine will be
just enough for most to bankrupt them.

> Hey, I wanted a more active program that started sooner too. The
> delays in everything was concession to Republicans who then still
> didn't vote for it.

That's like bitching the guy wouldn't buy your Toyota even though you
Armor Alled the tires

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:313692
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to