legal precedent != a law On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Eric Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > But it does make it law... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Medic [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 11:10 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: _Speaking_of_the_Supreme_Court:_Marine's_father_ord_ere > d_to_pay_court_costs_to_Westboro_Baptist_Churc > > > Just because a judge has made a ruling and set precedence does not mean that > it's a right. Just saying. > > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Eric Roberts < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> You are not paying attention...we have the right to privacy via court >> precedence. Not all laws and rights are written into the constitution. > Do >> I have to repeat this again or did you get it this time? >> >> Eric >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Timothy Heald [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 10:43 AM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: RE: _Speaking_of_the_Supreme_Court:_Marine's_father_ord_ere >> d_to_pay_court_costs_to_Westboro_Baptist_Churc >> >> >> You do not have either of the rights you mentioned. Not in this country >> under the constitution as written. >> >> Sent from my MOTOBLURT smartphone on AT&T >> >> -----Original message----- >> From: Eric Roberts <[email protected]> >> To: cf-community <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tue, Mar 30, 2010 15:14:48 GMT+00:00 >> Subject: RE: _Speaking_of_the_Supreme_Court:_Marine's_father_ord_ere >> d_to_pay_court_costs_to_Westboro_Baptist_Churc >> >> >> That's called common sense and common courtesy...but we do have a right to >> privacy and a right not to be harassed. This Chritofascist wackjobs do > not >> have a right to intrude in people's lives like this. My only hope is that >> when they do cross the wrong family (and that is a when...not an if) is >> that >> no one, other than these fucktards, gets hurt. >> >> Eric >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 10:01 AM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: RE: _Speaking_of_the_Supreme_Court:_Marine's_father_ord_ere >> d_to_pay_court_costs_to_Westboro_Baptist_Churc >> >> >> Wait we have a RIGHT to mourn in peace? >> >> What article or amendment of the constitution or USC or State and local >> code >> is that in? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eric Roberts [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 5:59 PM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: RE: _Speaking_of_the_Supreme_Court:_Marine's_father_ord_ere >> d_to_pay_court_costs_to_Westboro_Baptist_Churc >> >> >> It's not the right decision. What the court is saying the Westboro > Baptist >> Church's right's are more important that the right of a family to mourn in >> peace. An individual's right is more important that the right of a > church. >> This is bullshit it is what it is. While they do have a right to be > heard, >> they also have the responsibility to do so when it is appropriate. A >> funeral is not the appropriate place to protest with signs that have >> nothing >> to do with this individual who served honorably in our armed forces. If >> they ant to protest outside the pentagon, or outside the Whitehouse, then >> that is their right. Where this court has failed is one day they are > going >> to cross the wrong veteran's family and someone is going to come out guns >> blazing. While I would call it karma, that would have been very >> preventable. >> >> >> Not only do we need to put up a collection, but we also need to call for >> the >> impeachment of this judge. >> >> Eric >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Timothy Heald [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:43 PM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: RE:_Speaking_of_the_Supreme_Court:_Marine's_father_ord_ere >> d_to_pay_court_costs_to_Westboro_Baptist_Churc >> >> >> Its unpopular but the right decision. >> >> Sent from my MOTOBLURT smartphone on AT&T >> >> -----Original message----- >> From: Eric Roberts <[email protected]> >> To: cf-community <[email protected]> >> Sent: Mon, Mar 29, 2010 21:10:49 GMT+00:00 >> Subject: RE:_Speaking_of_the_Supreme_Court:_Marine's_father_ord_ere >> d_to_pay_court_costs_to_Westboro_Baptist_Churc >> >> >> WTF? *shakes head in disgust* >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 3:48 PM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Speaking of the Supreme Court: Marine's_father ord ered to pay >> court costs to Westboro Baptist Churc >> >> >> >> > http://mddailyrecord.com/2010/03/29/marines-father-ordered-to-pay-court-cost >> s-to-westboro-baptist-church/ >> >> Lawyers for the father of a Marine who died in Iraq and whose funeral was >> picketed by anti-gay protesters say a court has ordered him to pay the >> protesters' appeal costs. >> >> Lawyers for Albert Snyder of York, Pa., also say he is struggling to come >> up >> with fees associated with filing a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court. >> ... >> >> >> Phelps is a tool. >> (full disclosure - it's one of my company's papers) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:314401 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
