I would even say the despicable free speech zones are a precedent for doing something like this. I also think that as long as the language is precise and contained to this specific example, that it really isn't because we already have examples of very narrow limitation on freedom of speech.
Eric -----Original Message----- From: Maureen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 1:50 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: _Speaking_of_the_Supreme_Court:_Marine's_father_ord_ere d_to_pay_court_costs_to_Westboro_Baptist_Churc If the political conventions can have free speech zones for protesters, funeral homes and cemeteries should be able to have zones too. Frankly, I'm not keen on either. I thought all of the US was free speech zone. I hate Phelps with a fiery passion, but shutting him up is a dangerous precedent. On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Eric Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not really...it is just saying that you have these right, but you cannot > interrupt funeral services while exercising it. It's further defining the > right and delineating limitations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:314486 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
