On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:44 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > > Right, they are granted to the states or the people respectively. AKA the > 10th Amendment. > > I have no major problem with state and local laws in this arena. > > 4th - you are granted security in your person property and effects, doesn't > mean someone can't look at you.
Yes, there's that whole deal with the paparazzi, and nudists, as far as the public sector goes. I was thinking it related to privacy in a more concrete way than saying "privacy", though. "Unlawful *search* or seizure". Like we have a enumerated right to not be searched. Maybe it's illegal for the government to google us! :)p > 5th - I don't even see how this applies. Only sofar as you can keep secrets to yourself (sorta... self incrimination isn't quite the same, but sorta kinda related)... It's a stretch, maybe. :) :Denny -- Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous. David Hume ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:314516 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
