Me thinks you shouldn't get your news from the Comedy Channel. Gingrich / Hannuty weren't talking about Iran attacking us with Chemical weapons, they were refering to any country that signed the NPT that does not have nukes. Opps. Missed that part heh?
When Reagan suggested reducing arms he was building a strategic defense system, the one Obama dismantled. He also never guaranteed the safety of our enemy's to murder millions of Americans. In Obama's defense, he did say he was going to really hurt any country that did mass murder Americans with lots of TNT. But the fake news made you think reducing our weapons made us more vulnerable, here's the rest of Palin's comment: "Punch me in the face, and I'm not going to retaliate." Hmmm, sounds like Stewart's up to his editing tricks again. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1263914/Obamas-nuclear-strike-policy-softened-Iran-North-Korea.html#ixzz0ktNsdC1b The signing comes just days after the administration announced the U.S. would not use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states, even if they were to attack America with chemical or biological weapons. Barack Obama says he will not use nuclear weapons against countries that do not have a nuclear capability - even if they launch a chemical or biological attack against America. ... He added that non-nuclear countries which attacked the U.S. using chemical or biological warfare would still face a 'devastating conventional military response'. http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Politics/obama-medvedev-sign-nuclear-arms-reduction-treaty-replace/story?id=10318006 Today's signing comes just days after the White House announced the administration's new nuclear strategy, calling for the elimination of nuclear arms testing and development of new nuclear weapons. In what has perhaps been the most controversial point of the new policy is the United States' commitment to not use nuclear weapons against any country that has signed and is abiding by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, even if they attack the United States with chemical or biological weapons. On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-april-8-2010/the-big-bang-treaty > > How on earth can Americans understand what's happening in their country (and > the rest of the world) if the Number 1 news network no longer carries news? > > Fox outright lied about what was contained in the latest treaty. > > Sarah Palin brings up Reagan while ignoring the fact that Reagan proposed > this same treaty, and proposed to reduce nuclear arms by this same amount: > 1/3. > > How do the defenders of Fox news explain these discrepancies? > > The network appears to exist wholly and solely to pursue its own particular > agenda. > It has very little to do with accurate news reporting. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:315556 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
