What you are suggesting they meant, is not what was said. This is around 4 Minutes into the Clip where John introduces the Fox news excerpt.
Newt Gingrich: "If there were a biological attack, which killed over a million americans, is this President really saying we would not retaliate?" Hannity: "Yes! Yes that's what he said!" Newt: "What is it we would do?" Hannity:"Wait a minute, but that's what...that's what he said * emphatically* Am I to ,I mean.." Newt:"No no...I agree.That's what he said." What clip are you watching that has this play out completely differently, Sam? This is all I'm talking about. Not the actual policy, or for a breakdown of whether it makes the US safer/unsafe. Just the issue of the wilful misrepresentation-I call it Lieing-that was displayed here. You have not refuted that the above statements misrepresent what is stated in the US Policy. On 12 April 2010 09:56, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Me thinks you shouldn't get your news from the Comedy Channel. > > Gingrich / Hannuty weren't talking about Iran attacking us with > Chemical weapons, they were refering to any country that signed the > NPT that does not have nukes. Opps. Missed that part heh? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:315579 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
