I do not support warrantless wiretapping. It makes no difference who is in power.
It did not work in Obama's favor. Did the kid testify as to his motivation? At what point does it become not ok to invite a data breach? On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Pssst... Dana, you Dope-n-Changers support warrantless wiretapping now > that the clingers aren't the gatekeepers. > > What's interesting is you can't stand the idea of Uncle Sam listening > in while you chat with al Qaeda, but have no problem with a kid > publishing a vice-presidential candidates personal emails for the sole > purpose of influencing a national presidential election. I'm guessing > because it worked in your favor. > > On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Like warrantless wiretapping. Like pillaging the nation's resources >> for eight years on behalf of people who were sending it so swiss bank >> accounts. >> >> I don't even see how you get health care as unconstitutional. So was >> emancipation once upon a time. >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317159 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
