On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Eric Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > As long as they are warranted and went through the proper channels to do > so...
But they weren't > unlike the illegal wiretaps of the Bush administration that > circumvented the proper channels to invade the privacy of US citizens. There you go again. Obama is doing the same thing. Why not say The Obama admin? > There are legal methods of accessing someone's account that are set up to > allow law enforcement and the government to go after criminals and also > protect the privacy and rights of the rest of the citizenry. This wasn't one of them. So what if the gov did it illegally and published it? > Sam...you need to lay off the hallucinogens as well as you seem to be > hallucinating words like Scott has been. Is this a hallucination: >> ...unless it was after the case to prove guilt >> (like an official release to the news agenesis) or as part of an FOIA >> request... which caused me to say: So, you are saying the government or anyone else can invade your privacy as long as they end up finding illegal activity? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317248 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
