On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Kris Sisk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Even with Google it was their servers that were comprimised. It could be > they were comprimised via passwords gathered with spyware on workstations I > suppose, but that in itself wasn't damaging. It was the data on the servers > that got them. > A compromised password from a workstation (in itself) isn't damaging? How exactly does Linux defend against a compromised password again? :) -Cameron ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:320023 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
