for how long however. What is typical after this is the person concerned resigns after a short while.
And where did I say fire? or are you reading too much? Looking at emails through your rose/ideological coloured glasses? On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > He wasn't fired. He just resigned from that post. I believe he's still > a general. > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Well given that the whole episode has multiple violations of art. 88 >> of the UCMJ, I doubt that many will be staying in the army for much >> longer. >> >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I finally got around to reading the entire article in Rolling Stone >>> this morning. Rarely have I been as disgusted at a group of people >>> than I am at McChrystal and his aides, especially the aides. What an >>> irresponsible bunch of jack-offs. I'm going to be really po'd if the >>> entire bunch is not fired. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:322146 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
