I don't think he's a heel. I couldn't let the shoe thing slide though. It immediately makes my read Scott's posts in an Ed Sulivan voice. Which has had me cracking up for the last few hours.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Eric Roberts < [email protected]> wrote: > > I wasn't going to say anything even though he is such a heel :-D > > -----Original Message----- > From: Medic [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:31 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment > > > You heard the man. Shoe him. > > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I never said that 'weapons don't absorb energy to reduce recoil' > > Please shoe me where I said that. I did say it was against the laws of > > physics, but I was referring to being able to knock someone back > > several feet with a bullet frired from a gun. > > > > Now you are purposely taking my comments out of context, which is also > > dishonest. > > > > We could end this debate if you could just provide some shred of > > evidence that you are correct. > > > > I have fired a .45 at targets attached to wooden frames (made with > > 2x4s), lying on, but not attached to, the ground. Because I am not > > that good of a shot, I hit the frame several times. > > > > Based on what you have said, shouldn't the wooden frames been knocked > > back a few feet? Instead, they barely moved as the bullets passed > > completely through them. Care to explain how this happened? Maybe I > > had the magic gun shooting the magic bullets? > > > > It is obvious you have no proof or evidence to support your > > statements, why not just man up and admit you were/are wrong? > > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Eric Roberts > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > You stated that it was a violation of the laws of physics. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:57 AM > > > To: cf-community > > > Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment > > > > > > > > > Please show me where I said that. > > > > > > Attributing things to someone that they never said is dishonest. > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Eric Roberts > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> This coming from the guy that claims that weapons don't absorb energy > to > > >> reduce recoil. Whatever. The article specifically states that some > of > > > the > > >> kickback is the body's reaction to the force hitting it. Anyone who > > has > > >> fired a .45 and seen it hit an object can attest to the force of the > > blow. > > > > > > > > > -- > > Scott Stroz > > --------------- > > You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can > > wonder what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris > > > > http://xkcd.com/3 > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:323014 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
