Didn't you mean fast typing? hehehe -----Original Message----- From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:04 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Stupid fat fingers... On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote: > > You heard the man. Shoe him. > > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I never said that 'weapons don't absorb energy to reduce recoil' >> Please shoe me where I said that. I did say it was against the laws of >> physics, but I was referring to being able to knock someone back >> several feet with a bullet frired from a gun. >> >> Now you are purposely taking my comments out of context, which is also >> dishonest. >> >> We could end this debate if you could just provide some shred of >> evidence that you are correct. >> >> I have fired a .45 at targets attached to wooden frames (made with >> 2x4s), lying on, but not attached to, the ground. Because I am not >> that good of a shot, I hit the frame several times. >> >> Based on what you have said, shouldn't the wooden frames been knocked >> back a few feet? Instead, they barely moved as the bullets passed >> completely through them. Care to explain how this happened? Maybe I >> had the magic gun shooting the magic bullets? >> >> It is obvious you have no proof or evidence to support your >> statements, why not just man up and admit you were/are wrong? >> >> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Eric Roberts >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > You stated that it was a violation of the laws of physics. >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:57 AM >> > To: cf-community >> > Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment >> > >> > >> > Please show me where I said that. >> > >> > Attributing things to someone that they never said is dishonest. >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Eric Roberts >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> This coming from the guy that claims that weapons don't absorb energy to >> >> reduce recoil. Whatever. The article specifically states that some of >> > the >> >> kickback is the body's reaction to the force hitting it. Anyone who >> has >> >> fired a .45 and seen it hit an object can attest to the force of the >> blow. >> > >> >> >> -- >> Scott Stroz >> --------------- >> You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can >> wonder what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris >> >> http://xkcd.com/3 >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:323017 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
