Not sure where you get I said it was physically imposible for a gun to absorb 'backblast' from that statement.
Once again, my stance has consistently been that it is physically imposible for a bullet fired from a handgun or rifle, to knock a person back a few feet. I never made any statements about how guns may or may not handle 'backblast'. And just in case it happens to come up, I did stipulate that it may be posible with a 'rail gun'. It does has a different mechanism of launching a projectile, but I am not aware of any 'rail guns' that could be the equivalent of rifles or handguns. On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Eric Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > And this... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 4:08 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment > > > OK...you keep believing in magic guns and bullets, I stay firmly > rooted in the real world. Sound fair? -- Scott Stroz --------------- You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can wonder what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris http://xkcd.com/386/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:323023 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
