On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> See, shit like this makes me think that maybe the Tea Party-ers have a
> point (as skewed as it may be) when talking about a 'revolution'

Their point seems to be mostly centered around money.  And taxes.

Only taxes are the lowest they've been, and the money complaints only
began when Obama took office (hint: we were well into the red prior).

They aren't focused on privacy issues, as far as I can tell.

Do they donate a lot of money to the EFF, I wonder?

Humans are so easy to manipulate.  If only conscious manipulation
wasn't anathema to me...

Bah.  I'm with Judah.  A privacy amendment makes sense (unlike, say,
the retarded marriage amendment-- which, BTW, is one of the TP's
talking points, neh?).

:Den

-- 
If there is such a thing as a good marriage, it is because it
resembles friendship rather than love.
Michel de Montaigne

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:326217
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to