On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Scott Stroz wrote: > > I can see how someone who rallies against a program/bill and then > tries to reap the benefits of that program/bill would be labeled a > hypocrite (and I would probably label them as such).
I would label them "pretty much normal". =)p I, personally, like to rail against welfare, and yet I'm on food stamps. (Not really, but still. ;]) > But to say that the constituents of someone who rallied against a > program SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED to reap the benefits of that > program/bill - even the people who may not have voted for the > Congress-person in question - is a bit....I want to say 'extreme', but > even 'extreme' does not full capture it. It's just wrong., and sooooo > not what this country is supposed to be about. I think Judah was talking about the hypocrites, and it seemed more like "shouldn't", vs. "SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED", but perhaps you were replying to someone else's sentiment? Judah, to me, seemed to be talking about principles. :Den -- There are various eyes. Even the Sphinx has eyes: and as a result there are various truths, and as a result there is no truth. Friedrich Nietzsche ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:329372 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
